Concept of Crisis Management Revisited
Friends, Thank you very much for taking out time from your busy schedule to read my blog(s). Sharing knowledge with you has become my passion now. I feel encouraged after reading your feedback in the comments column. Today I’m happy to present my 95th Blog “Concept of Crisis Management Revisited”.
Friends, an Issue, if not
properly handled and timely resolved, can turn
into a Crisis and become an Emergency. Let’s first differentiate
among an issue, a crisis, and an emergency.
Issue: An issue is a matter
in dispute or a subject of controversy. An emerging issue is a matter that
shows signs of developing into a dispute
or controversy. Dispute generally involves different point of views between
adversaries, about what should be or should not be done or how a matter of
mutual concern should be handled.
Crisis: A crisis is a stage
at which all future events affecting person or an organization are
determined. It is a major
turning point resulting in permanent drastic change. It is far more crucial than most issues or
emergencies. Crises are of great importance but
they are rare.
Emergency: An emergency is
a sudden, usually unexpected, occurrence that requires prompt action. While
demanding serious and prompt attention, emergencies do not indicate a major
turning point in the person’s
or organization existence. Issues become emergencies when they develop into
challenges that require urgent decisive action. Friends, crises are major
unpredictable events that threaten to harm the organizations, its stakeholders
or general public. Although crisis is unpredictable but is not unexpected.
Crisis can affect all segments of society i.e. businesses, educational
institutions, families, non-profit organizations and the government and are caused by a wide range of reasons.
Although the definitions of
crises can vary greatly, four elements are common to most definitions of
crisis: (a) Threat to the organization, (b) Element of surprise, (c) Short
decision (d) Process of transformation A crisis in an organization is
‘any emotionally charged situation that,
once it becomes public, invites negative stakeholder reaction and thereby has
the potential to threaten the financial well-being, reputation, or survival of
the organization or some
portion thereof’.
Types of Crisis 1. Natural
Crisis 2. Product Failure 3. Technological Crisis 4. Confrontation Crisis 5.
Crisis of Malevolence 6. Crisis of Organizational Misdeeds.
Natural
Crisis:
Natural crisis, typically natural disasters considered as acts
of God, are such environmental phenomena
as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tornadoes and hurricanes, floods,
landslides, tsunamis, storms, and droughts that threaten life, property, and
the environment itself.
Product Failure: Failure of
a product can be a major disaster for a Company, since the present and future
of the company depends entirely on the acceptability and reputation of their
products.
Technological Crisis:
Technological
crisis are caused by human application of science and technology. Technological
accidents inevitably occur when technology becomes complex and coupled and
something goes wrong in the system as a whole such as Technological
breakdowns e.g. software failures,
industrial accidents, and oil spills.
Confrontation Crisis:
Confrontation crisis occur when discontented individuals or groups fight businesses, government, and various
interest groups to win acceptance of their demands and expectations. The common
type of confrontation crises is
boycotts, and other types are picketing, sit-ins, ultimatums to those in
authority, blockade or occupation of buildings, and resisting or disobeying
police.
Crisis
of Malevolence:
An
organization faces a crisis of malevolence when opponents or miscreant
individuals use criminal means or other extreme tactics for the purpose of
expressing hostility or anger towards, or seeking gain from, a company, country, or
economic system, perhaps with the aim of destabilizing or destroying it. Sample
crises include product tampering, kidnapping, malicious rumors, terrorism, and
espionage.
Crisis
of Organizational Misdeeds:
Crisis occur when management takes actions it knows will harm or place stake-holders
at risk for harm without adequate precautions. Lerbinger specified three different types of crises of
organizational misdeeds: 1. Crisis of Skewed Management Values, 2. Crisis of Deception, and 3. Crisis of Management Misconduct.
Crisis of Skewed Management are caused when managers favour short-term economic gain and neglect broader social
values and stakeholders other than investors. This state of lopsided values is
rooted in the classical business creed that focuses on the interests of
stock-holders and tends to view the
interests of its other stake-holders such as customers, employees, and the
community.
Crisis
of Deception occur when management conceals or misrepresents information about
itself and its products in its dealing with consumers and others.
Crisis
of Management Misconduct are caused not only by skewed values and deception but
deliberate amorality and illegality e.g.: (a) Workplace
Violence Crises occur when an employee
or former employee commits violence against other employees on organizational
grounds. (b) Rumors False
information about an organization or its products creates crises hurting the organization’s
reputation. Sample is linking the
organization to radical groups or stories that their products are contaminated.
Crisis
Management consists of (a) Methods
used to respond to both the reality and perception of crisis. (b) Establishing metrics to define what scenarios
constitute a crisis and should consequently trigger the necessary response
mechanisms. (c) Communication
that occurs within the response phase of emergency management scenarios.
Crisis
management is occasionally referred to as incident management also. The credibility and reputation of organizations is
heavily influenced by the perception of their responses during crisis
situations. The organization and communication involved in responding to a
crisis in a timely fashion makes for a challenge in businesses. There must be
open and consistent communication throughout the hierarchy to contribute to a
successful crisis communication process.
During
the crisis management process, it is important to identify types of crisis, in
that different crisis necessitate
the use of different crisis management strategies. Potential crises are
enormous, but crisis can be
clustered. Successfully defusing a crisis requires an understanding of how to handle a crisis before
they occur.
Following are the various phases of Crisis Management:
1. Anticipating the Crisis,
Preventing Crisis or the diagnosis of
the impending trouble or the danger signals.
2. Action during a Crisis / Resolving Crisis
or choosing appropriate Turnaround
Strategy.
3. Action Post Crisis / the
Aftermath or Implementation of the
change process and its monitoring. Crisis is also a facet of risk management.
The
primary aims or benefits of crisis management would normally include:
(a) Ability to assess the situation from inside and
outside the organization as
all stakeholders might perceive it.
(b) Techniques to direct
action(s) to contain the likely or perceived damage spread.
(c) A more effective way to
rapidly trigger that part or parts of business continuity management.
(d) Better organizational
resilience for all stakeholders.
(e) Compliance with regulatory and ethical
requirements, e.g. corporate social responsibility.
(f) Much better management of serious incidents or any
incident that could become serious.
(g) Improved staff
awareness of their roles and expectations within the organization.
(h) Increased ability,
confidence and morale within the organization.
(i) Enhanced risk management in so far that obvious risks
will be identified, mitigated (where possible) and through crisis and business
continuity management - as prepared for.
(j) Protected and often enhanced reputation a much
reduced risk of post event litigation.
Role of PR in Crisis
Situation
There are five PR steps
that should be executed in order to properly
manage a crisis. First, the corporate in
crisis should be prompt, addressing the public immediately following the
discovery of the crisis.
Second, the corporate in question should maintain honesty because the
public is more willing to forgive an honest mistake than a calculated lie.
Third,
it is important to be informative because the media as well as the public will
create their own rumors if no information is given to them by the corporate in crisis. Rumors can cause significantly more
damage to the corporate than
the truth.
Fourth, it is important to be concerned and show the public
you care because people will be more forgiving if it is clear that the corporate cares about the victims of the crisis.
Fifth, maintain two-way relationships. This is important
because the corporate can
learn a lot about the status of public opinion by listening. The
above five PR steps are necessary in
order to manage any crisis situation.
#####
Comments
Post a Comment