Correcting the Greenwash: Transparency and Accountability in PR

Thank you for landing on my blog page.

Friends, I’m passionate about sharing knowledge with you, and your feedback is a constant source of encouragement. I firmly believe that ‘Everything I do or say is PR,’ and this belief drives me to continuously create and share valuable content. I'm happy to share my 220th blog post: “Correcting the Greenwash: Transparency and Accountability in PR”.

Friends, I was recently reading an article about the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) when a mention of greenwashing caught my attention and inspired me to explore the concept at length; the result is this blog.

Friends, Greenwashing did not emerge in a vacuum; it evolved as a corporate reflex to the birth of modern environmentalism. In the late 1960s and 1970s, as the public became increasingly aware of air pollution, oil spills, and dwindling natural resources, "being green" shifted from an activist concern to a powerful consumer demand. Companies quickly realized that an environmentally friendly image was a potent competitive advantage. However, rather than overhauling complex supply chains or sacrificing profit margins for sustainability, many organizations found it cheaper and faster to simply rebrand. This gave rise to "Greenwashing" a term coined in 1986 by American environmentalist Jay Westerveld to describe the cynical practice of companies spending more on promoting their "green" credentials than on actually minimizing their environmental impact. It came into existence as a bridge between a company’s desire for profit and the public’s growing demand for corporate responsibility, often resulting in a "green sheen" that masks ecological harm.

Understanding Greenwashing using 5Ws and H:

1. What is Greenwashing?

Greenwashing is a form of marketing deception where companies mislead consumers into believing their products, services, or organizational goals are environmentally friendly when they are not. It ranges from "minor exaggerations" to "blatant lies."

• Subtle Example: A water bottle company using a green leaf logo and images of mountain springs on a plastic bottle that is not recyclable and was bottled using carbon-intensive processes.
• Technical Example: A company claiming a product is "chemical-free." Biologically, everything (including water) is a chemical. This is a scientifically empty claim used to manipulate fear.
• Expansion: It often manifests as "the sin of the hidden trade-off," where a company highlights one small eco-friendly attribute (like recycled packaging) while ignoring the massive carbon footprint of the actual manufacturing process.

2. Why Do Companies Engage in Greenwashing?

The primary driver is the "Green Premium." Research shows that Gen Z and Millennial consumers are willing to pay up to 20% more for products they believe are sustainable.

• Example (Market Pressure): An airline might claim "Carbon Neutral Flight" to prevent customers from feeling "flight shame." Instead of changing fuel types, they buy cheap, unverified carbon offsets to check a box.
• Example (Investment): Companies inflate their green credentials to attract "Impact Investors" who are legally bound to only invest in sustainable portfolios.
• Example (Competitive Edge): In a crowded market like the FMCG sector, being the only "natural" or "pure" brand on the shelf can lead to a significant surge in market share, even if the claims are unverified.

3. Who is Affected by Greenwashing?

Greenwashing is not a victimless crime. It creates a ripple effect of distrust across the global economy.

• Example (The Consumer): A parent buys "organic" baby clothes at a premium price, only to discover the dyes used are toxic and the "organic" certification was self-awarded by the brand.
• Example (Honest Businesses): A small startup that spends 40% of its budget on ethical sourcing is driven out of business by a conglomerate that "fakes" the same look for 5% of the cost.
• Example (The Environment): Perhaps most critically, greenwashing causes "climate delay." When people believe a problem is being solved by corporate action, they stop pushing for the systemic changes and regulations that are actually required to save the planet.

4. When Did Greenwashing Become a Concern?

While the term was coined in the 1986, the 2015 Paris Agreement adopted by 195 parties at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) forced corporations to set "Net Zero" targets.

5. Where Does Greenwashing Occur?

It is no longer limited to heavy industry (oil and gas); it has permeated the digital and service sectors.

• Example-Digital/Tech: Tech giants claiming "100% Green Data Centers" while ignoring the massive environmental cost of mining the two critical chemical elements - lithium and cobalt required for the hardware that powers them.
• Example-Fashion: "Fast Fashion" brands launching "Recycled Collections" that represent less than 1% of their total output, using the tiny green line to mask the waste of the other 99%.
• Example-Finance: "Green Bonds" or "ESG Funds" that include fossil fuel companies or high-polluting industries under the guise of "transitioning."

6. How Can We Spot Greenwashing?

Identifying greenwash requires a critical eye for "The Seven Sins of Greenwashing," a framework developed by Terra Choice, an environmental marketing firm, to help consumers, businesses, and regulators identify misleading or deceptive environmental claims (greenwashing) on products and services.

1.   Sin of the Hidden Trade-Off: Suggesting a product is "green" based on a narrow set of attributes while ignoring other significant environmental impacts. Example: Paper products touting "recycled content" or "sustainably sourced" without addressing energy use, water pollution, or greenhouse gas emissions in manufacturing.

2.   Sin of No Proof: An environmental claim that cannot be easily substantiated by accessible evidence or reliable third-party certification. Example: Claims like "X% post-consumer recycled" on tissues or cleaners without supporting data, certifications, or website proof.

3.   Sin of Vagueness: Broad, poorly defined, or ambiguous claims likely to be misunderstood by consumers.  Example: Terms like "all-natural," "eco-friendly," or "green"- arsenic is natural but toxic; "natural" doesn't guarantee environmental benefit.

4.   Sin of Irrelevance: A truthful claim that is unimportant or unhelpful for consumers seeking truly preferable products (often something already mandated by law). Example: "CFC-free" aerosols chlorofluorocarbons have been banned under the Montreal Protocol since the late 1980s/early 1990s, so the claim adds no real value.

5.   Sin of Lesser of Two Evils: A claim that is true within its category but distracts from the product's overall greater environmental harm. Example: "Organic" cigarettes or "fuel-efficient" SUVs, they may have some green attribute, but the category (tobacco or large vehicles) remains highly problematic environmentally.

6.   Sin of Fibbing: Simply false or fabricated environmental claims. Example: Outright lies about energy savings, recycled content, or emissions reductions that don't hold up under scrutiny.

7.   Sin of Worshiping False Labels: Giving the impression of third-party endorsement or certification where none exists (fake labels, misleading imagery, or self-awarded badges). Example: Using look-alike eco-seals, phony "certified green" logos bought online, or implying endorsement by reputable programs like Eco Logo or Green Seal without actual certification. This sin surged in later reports.

Friends, I strongly believe that greenwashing is a calculated marketing tactic (What) driven by profit and image (Why) that harms consumers and the planet (Who). It has evolved from hotel towel cards to global corporate policy (When), appearing in every sector from fashion to finance (Where), and is identified by vague language and lack of data (How).

How We, The PR Professionals Can Correct the Mistake:

If a company is caught greenwashing, the PR strategy must shift from perception management to radical accountability.

1. Conduct a Reality Audit: Before drafting a press release, ask for the data. If the sustainability team can’t provide a spreadsheet, the marketing team shouldn't provide a slogan.
2. Acknowledge and Apologize: If caught, avoid "non-apology apologies." Instead, use: "We oversimplified our impact, and we were wrong."
3. Radical Transparency: Use the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) framework mandated by SEBI. Provide a "Green Dashboard" on the company website where stakeholders can track real-time progress.
4. Internal Advocacy: PR must have a seat at the board table to prevent "Greenlighting" highlighting a tiny green project to hide a massive environmental disaster elsewhere.
5. Scientific Collaboration: Partner with environmental scientists and NGOs during the campaign planning phase to ensure claims are scientifically sound.

Friends, Greenwashing is more than just a "marketing mistake"; it is a breach of the social contract. When a company misleads the public about its environmental impact, it actively hinders the global effort to combat climate change by diverting capital away from truly sustainable solutions. This makes the PR professional’s responsibility ethical, not just commercial.

The future of PR lies in "Radical Honesty." This means being bold enough to communicate where a company is failing just as much as where it is succeeding. A brand that says, "We are currently using 60% virgin plastic, but our goal is 40% by next year," earns more trust than a brand that claims to be "Plastic Neutral" through accounting tricks. Authentic PR is no longer about spinning the truth; it is about telling the truth in a way that creates value and drives progress.

To conclude; to correct the Greenwash, companies must move beyond the campaign mindset. Sustainability is not a quarterly project; it is a permanent operational shift. We, The PR professionals must act as the bridge between corporate action and public expectation. By prioritizing transparency over imagery and accountability over accolades; We, the PR professionals can transform from a source of skepticism into a powerful catalyst for a truly sustainable world. If we aren't actually green, the most professional thing we can do is not say we are. The future of our planet, and our brand's survival, depends on it.

Thank you for reading the blog.

#####